|
|
|
| This
paper studies the high frequency reaction of the DEM/USD exchange rate
to publicly announced macroeconomic information emanating from Germany
and the U.S. By using data sampled at a five-minute frequency, we are
able to identify significant impacts of most announcements on the exchange
rate change in the 15 minutes post-announcement, although the significance
of these effects decreases rapidly as the interval over which the post-announcement
change in exchange rates is increased. The direction of the exchange
rate response conforms, in general, with a reaction function interpretation
whereby reactions to macroeconomic news are driven by the likely operations
of monetary authorities in domestic money markets. Further, we detect
influences of German monetary policy decisions on the reaction of the
exchange rate, and also differences between U.S. and German announcements
in the exchange rate reaction time pattern. |
| This
paper examines the effects of scheduled Australian and US macroeconomic
announcements on daily USD/AUD exchange rate changes. EGARCH(1,1) models
are used to investigate news effects on the conditional mean and volatility
of the changes over various time horizons encompassing the announcements.
A higher than expected Australian current account deficit announcement
depreciated the AUD while an unexpectedly higher Australian GDP growth
rate appreciated it on the announcement day during the Australian market
trading. The conditional volatility was higher in response to the Australian
current account deficit and inflation news, while the retail sales news
lowered it. The US announcements, in general, had little effect during
the US market trading, however, news effects measured over wider time
horizon encompassing the next calendar day's Australian trading turned
out to be more significant. Unexpectedly large US trade deficit and unemployment
announcements appreciated the AUD while the trade deficit and retail sales
news raised the conditional volatility and the unemployment news lowered
it. |
| Measured
with intraday data in a 1987-1991 sample period, the mark/dollar exchange
rate was affected by unanticipated information about the trade deficit
and the consumer price index. The exchange rate showed no significant
response to news about money supply, industrial production, the producer
price index, or unemployment. Trade deficit surprises were negatively
correlated with the value of the dollar as expected. CPI surprises showed
a positive correlation, as would be predicted by sticky price models of
exchange rates.The market's reaction to the 8:30am trade deficit announcement
was complete by 9am, but the market's response to the CPI announcement
was not as immediate. No significant reaction had occurred by 9am, and
the spot price did not fully digest the information until 1pm. Significant
responses were present in the 9am, 11am, and noon hours. Alternate measures
of currency returns failed to explain this delayed response. |
| This
paper investigates the effects of the Australian current account news
on exchange rates and interest rates for the period July 1985 to December
1992. The results indicate that the Australian dollar depreciated and
interest rates rose as a result of an announcement of a larger than expected
current account deficit. This is consistent with the view that market
participants expected a foreign exchange market intervention sale of the
Australian dollar by the Reserve Bank of Australia and they used the portfolio
balance model of exchange rate determination when responding to the news.
In addition, significant structural breaks were found and the analysis
shows that after January 1990 the news affected neither exchange rates
nor interest rates. |
| The
paper examines the impact of major U.S. macroeconomic announcements on
the Dollar/Yen exchange rate. We find that these announcements are responsible
for most intraday and day-of-the-week volatility patterns in this market
and we identify the most important announcements. The initial reaction
to a major 8:30 announcement begins around 8:30:10 and lasts until about
8:30:50. A partial price correction is normally observed between 8:31
and 8:32. Price movements after 8:32 are basically independent of those
observed earlier although volatility continues to be higher than normal
until about 8:55. |
| This
paper focuses on an old issue--the linkage between money announcements
and the exchange rate. It shows that the magnitude of the time-varying
response of the spot exchange rate to an unanticipated money announcement
is mainly driven by agents' expectations of the Federal Reserve's time-varying
response to the deviation of the actual money supply from a prespecified
target. The inference is that the magnitude of the exchange rate's response
to economic announcements depends on market participants' expectations
about the announcements and the Fed's probable monetary policy response. |
| This
paper uses an extremely high frequency data set on the dollar-sterling
exchange rate to investigate the impact of news events on the very short-term
movements in exchange rates. The data set is a continuous record of the
quoted price for the exchange rate on the Reuters screen. As such it records
some 130,000 observations over an 8-week period. The paper investigates
the time-series properties of the data using orthodox regression models,
and then by making allowance for a time-varying conditional variance.
The conclusions vary significantly in moving to this more sophisticated
model. The exercises are repeated now incorporating news announcement
effects, letting these affect the level of the exchange rate and then
the conditional variance process. Again it is found that the conclusions
are radically altered in moving to the increasingly sophisticated model.
Coauthors are S. G. Hall, S. G. G. Henry, and B. Pesaran. |
| This
paper documents variation across Pacific Rim countries in the response
of equity values to U.S. M1 announcement surprise. We relate the difference
across countries to measures of capital mobility, export trade with the
U.S., foreign exchange and money market arrangements, and correlation
with the U.S. stock market. We find that the response to U.S. M1 surprises
is best explained by the country's degree of integration with international
capital markets. The flexibility of the exchange rate and interest rates
may also be significant. While the evidence is supportive of the "anticipated
Fed reaction" theory of the effect of money announcement surprises, the
differing response to M1 shcocks across Fed policy regimes remains unexplained. |
| The
effect of U.S. trade deficit announcements on the dollar exchange rate
from 1980-88 is examined. The announcement is found to affect the dollar
only after mid-1984. Central bank intervention does not appear to have
had a consistent impact on the dollar on the day of the announcement. |
| Intradaily
movements in the yen/dollar exchange rate are examined in four nonoverlapping
segments within each business day from January 1980 to September 1985.
The results indicate that the dollar tended to appreciate in the New York
segment and depreciate in the European segment. In three of the four subsamples
considered, the Tokyo segment made virtually no contribution to annual
yen/dollar rate movements. The volatility of the exchange rate also differed
across markets. Finally, in examining the relative effects of news from
the United States and Japan explicitly, U.S. money announcement surprises
had the most consistent effects. |
| This
paper articulates a model of the small, open economy in which the stock
market, rather than the bond market, determines domestic aggregate demand.
It resembles in many respects the widely adopted dynamic Mundell-Fleming
approach, but can, in some circumstances, exhibit output and asset price
dynamics that differ in economically illuminating ways from that more
standard framework. In particular, if the stock market effects are important
enough, then a monetary expansion can result in real exchange rate appreciation,
rather than depreciation. Anticipated fiscal expansion can, if the favorable
effects on future productivity lead to strong enough stock market effects,
lead to an output expansion, rather than a contraction as in, for example,
Burgstaller (1983), Blanchard (1984) and Branson, Fraga and Johnson
(1985). Furthermore, if the delay between announcement and implementation
of the fiscal expansion is long enough, an anticipated fiscal expansion
can lead to exchange rate depreciation, rather than appreciation. |
 |
Existing
Studies on the Effect
of News Announcement
on Exchange Rate |
|
| With
Abstract |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
1. |
Almeida,
Alvaro; Goodhart, Charles A. E.; Payne, Richard (September 1998) "The
Effects of Macroeconomic News on High Frequency Exchange Rate Behavior,"
Journal
of Financial and Quantitative Analysis;
33(3),
pp. 383-408 |
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Kim,
Suk Joong (September 1998) "Do
Australian and the US Macroeconomic News Announcements Affect the USD/AUD
Exchange Rate? Some Evidence from E-GARCH Estimations," Journal
of Multinational Financial Management; 8(2-3),
pp. 233-248 |
| |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Tanner,
Glenn (April 1997)
"A Note on Economic News and Intraday Exchange Rates," Journal
of Banking and Finance; pp.
573-585 |
| |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Karfakis,
Costas; Kim, Suk-Joong (August 1995) "Exchange
Rates, Interest Rates and Current Account News: Some Evidence from Australia,"
Journal
of International Money and Finance; pp.
575-595 |
| |
|
|
|
|
5. |
Ederington,
Louis H.; Lee, Jae Ha (1994) "
Rate to Economic Announcements Response of the Dollar/Yen Exc," Financial
Engineering and the Japanese Markets; 1(2),
pp. 111-128 |
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
Kearney,
Adrienne A. (April 1995) "The
Changing Influence of Money and Monetary Policy on Exchange Rates,"
Economic
Inquiry; 33(2),
pp. 203-216 |
| |
|
|
|
|
7. |
Goodhart,
C. A. E. et al. (Jan-March 1993) "New
Effects in a High-Frequency Model of the Sterling-Dollar Exchange Rate,"
Journal
of Applied Econometrics; 8(1),
pp. 1-13 |
| |
|
|
|
|
8. |
Bailey,
Warren (September 1990) "U.S.
Money Supply Announcements and Pacific Rim Stock Markets: Evidence and Implications,"
Journal
of International Money and Finance; 9(3),
pp. 344-356 |
| |
|
|
|
|
9. |
Irwin,
Douglas A. (December 1989) "Trade
Deficit Announcements, Intervention, and the Dollar," Economics
Letters; 31(3),
pp. 257-262 |
| |
|
|
|
|
10 |
Ito,
Takatoshi; Roley, V. Vance (March 1987) "News
from the U.S. and Japan: Which Moves the Yen/Dollar Exchange Rate?,"
Journal
of Monetary Economics; 19(2), pp. 255-277 |
| |
|
|
|
|
11. |
Gavin,
Michael K. (April 1986) "The
Stock Market and Exchange Rate Dynamics," Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System International Finance Discussion
Papers: 278, pp. 82 |
|
|
|
| |
12. |
London,
Anselm (Feb. 1981) "Bank Rate Changes and Exchange
Rate Movements: A Test for Anticipations and Announcement Effects,"
Canadian Journal of Economics; 14(1),
pp. 115-119 |
|
|
|
©
2000 The Chinese University of Hong Kong
|
|